In late summer, Scott Jennings received a call from LA Times owner Patrick Soon-Shiong. Though Jennings had written dozens of columns for the newspaper over the years, the political commentator had never met Soon-Shiong, who mentioned having an appreciation for his approach, both as a commentator at CNN—where he’s emerged as one of the network’s most prominent conservative voices—and in print. “We struck up a little back-and-forth about what he was doing at the paper,” Jennings says, “which then ultimately led to him asking if I would be willing to join the editorial board.”
Having watched Jennings on CNN panels, Soon-Shiong tells me he was “impressed by his demeanor and by the way he would present his point of view,” which he says, “was always with respect.” Jennings’s commentary, in Soon-Shiong’s view, was “based on his analysis of factual information rather than speculative information.” Soon-Shiong recalls telling Jennings, “This is what we need more of in our newspaper.”
That private chat months back was a harbinger of the very public discussion playing out now around Soon-Shiong’s stewardship of the Times. A fairly low-key owner since acquiring the paper in 2018, Soon-Shiong rattled the newsroom in late October by spiking an endorsement of Kamala Harris in the final weeks of the election; reportedly demanded an editorial opposing an opinion piece critical of Donald Trump’s Cabinet picks, causing the editors to pull the story; and has been outspoken about reshaping the editorial board. And he’s touted Jennings as the type of voice he’d like more of at the paper, with the conservative commentator announcing on X in late November that he was accepting the owner’s invitation.
While the Times editorial-board role has lately gotten attention, it’s just the latest of Jennings’s media perches as a new Trump era gets underway. He already hosts a podcast, Flyover Country, in which Soon-Shiong recently appeared as a guest and mused about creating a “bias meter” for Times news and opinion coverage, while Jennings’s most high-profile gig remains as CNN’s go-to Trump defender, a role he played throughout the 2024 election cycle and into the transition.
“They’ve given me a platform. No one ever tells me what to do or what not to do. I don’t have any scripts, and I’ve never been censored,” Jennings, 47, says of the network, where he’s been a contributor since 2017. “There was a lot of political anxiety in the country about the election, but CNN never shied away from allowing that debate to unfold on the air,” he says, adding that programming like Abby Phillip’s NewsNight, which lends itself to pundit panels, have encouraged open and honest discussion. “Kudos to CNN for bringing a lot of different voices to the table this election,” Jennings praised.
Jennings’s pro-Trump commentary and at times contentious exchanges with CNN guests have led to his share of viral clips—and criticism. As Joe Biden hosted the president-elect at the White House, Jennings could be seen on CNN, gloating, “Did you ever think you’d see literal Hitler in the Oval Office?” referencing former Trump officials calling Trump a “fascist,” a narrative that took hold in the final stretch of the 2024 race. Jennings also drew criticism from analyst Karen Finney for his argument that Biden’s pardon of his son Hunter Biden should outrage Americans, “except the most partisan, brain-rotted people.” Finney called out Jennings for his rhetoric, saying, “That’s a little beyond the pale, even for you, Scott!”
Just last week, Jennings snapped at Bakari Sellers for tapping his arm during a debate about Trump’s recent comments on his ability to lower grocery store prices. “Don’t touch me,” Jennings said. He also tussled with Audie Cornish during a discussion of the verdict in the Daniel Penny trial, in which Jennings argued Penny was a victim. “He needs a clip for the internet,” Cornish said of Jennings. Mehdi Hasan, a former MSNBC host and now Zeteo editor in chief and CEO, wrote after the on-air spat that “Jennings may be one of the most unpleasant and disingenuous people on cable television—and that’s saying a lot.”
Regardless of how tense things can get on air, Jennings tells me that he has “forged and formed a number of very close friendships” with his fellow commentators, specifically shouting out Van Jones and David Axelrod and saying that the cohort of CNN contributors has been “one of the greatest things about this job.” And Jones praised Jennings in an interview, saying he has “been our secret weapon in being a very strong conservative voice but one that our audience can understand and appreciate.”
“What’s in Scott is a deep respect for everyday people, a desire to not just agitate, but to educate the person he’s talking to about a different point of view,” Jones adds of his colleague. He also commended Jennings for continuing to show support for Israeli hostages being held by Hamas in Gaza by donning a yellow ribbon pin in every segment.
Axelrod, who Jennings says is his closest friend from his tenure at CNN thus far, praised the pundit for his ability to cut “issues in ways that are provocative and go viral,” adding that Jennings has “created these ‘own the libs,’ kind of freewheeling moments, particularly on some of these panels.”
“I don’t always love what he does on TV,” says Axelrod, “but [that’s] not the whole of how I judge him.”
Before making the MAGA case on CNN, Jennings had taken a more traditional path through Republican politics, working for the likes of George W. Bush, Mitt Romney, and Mitch McConnell. During the 2016 race, Jennings referred to Trump in a column as “authoritarian” and called out his “vulgar” and “crude” behavior in another, examples that were pointed out in a Washington Post profile of Jennings, which noted he “changed his tune after Trump took office.”
Jennings says Trump has altered the trajectory of the Republican Party by not adhering to “conservative orthodoxy” on the issues that have shaped the party’s platform. Sometimes on air, that manifests in a fierce defense of the president-elect. Jennings took it upon himself to back Trump’s controversial pick to lead the Department of Defense, former Fox News host Pete Hegseth. Jennings slammed the current Pentagon leadership, saying, “I’ve had just about enough of the so-called insiders running the defense department.”
“Yeah, he’s on TV, but so are the rest of us,” he pointed out, pushing back against his colleagues’ assertion that Hegseth lacks government experience.
There was chatter about Jennings himself joining the Trump administration. He was rumored to be on a short list of candidates to serve as the White House press secretary, a job that ultimately went to Karoline Leavitt. Jennings tells me he was not “actively seeking” a role in the administration and wasn’t behind any campaign suggesting his candidacy. “I have no plans to join the Trump administration right now,” he added.
The press secretary gig would be one in which Jennings presumably couldn’t break with Trump—something he says he’s willing to do on CNN. “There have been times when he has done things, said things, that I didn’t agree with, and I’ve not been shy about saying that on the air,” he says. Following Trump’s appearance earlier this year at the National Association of Black Journalists conference, where Trump questioned Vice President Kamala Harris’s race, Jennings did not mince words, saying that Trump did “crap the bed” during the interview: “The only question is whether he’s going to roll around in it or change the sheets.” Axelrod also believes Jennings isn’t “blindly defending everything Trump does.”
“We have free speech in this country, and we have free debate, and we all have to collectively make decisions about how we’re going to govern ourselves,” says Jennings, stressing the need for debating issues in “an honest and open format.”
“I think CNN is doing that,” he says. “I think the LA Times could do that.”
“When Patrick told me what his vision was for the newspaper—report the news and have a balanced editorial page—I thought that’s exactly what media should be,” Jennings says, adding that he doesn’t understand “what’s so controversial about that.”
But Soon-Shiong’s shake-up at the Times has been “controversial,” as his Times itself described it this past weekend. Since the Harris endorsement imbroglio, the Times has seen a steady wave of opinion section departures, leaving only one of the original board members remaining; meanwhile, the Times reported, an estimated 20,000 subscribers dropped the paper. Oliver Darcy, who has been reporting on upheaval inside the Times, framed Soon-Shiong’s actions atop Monday’s “Status” newsletter as “Meddling for MAGA.”
The Times owner touched on the opinion resignations in our interview, saying that “it was clear that there were very strong feelings about this idea of having a balanced viewpoint.” Soon-Shiong says that he felt that the editorial board was “veering very progressive,” and in his mind “it was really not healthy just to have what I call an echo chamber of a single view and almost canceling, so to speak, the views of both sides.”
Soon-Shiong says he is working through a list of around 20 to 25 candidates “across the spectrum from left, center, to right,” who he is contacting personally with a potential opportunity to join the restructured editorial board. While he declined to share any names on the list, Soon-Shiong says it will likely be announced early 2025, once the board is full of new contributors. Jennings’s role, it should be noted, is not a staff position.
“I think what he wants to do is kind of visionary, truthfully,” Jennings tells me of Soon-Shiong’s plans. “The editorial board should not be an echo chamber. There should be views that represent all of America.”
The Year In Review
-
Richard Lawson Ranks the Year’s Best Movies
-
The Top TV Shows of 2024
-
The Performances That We Couldn’t Take Our Eyes Off
-
The Biggest Celebrities We Lost
-
The 10 Books That Famous Bookworms Loved
-
Plus: the 68 Best Christmas Movies of All Time
-
From the Archive: the War Behind the Making of The Godfather
The post Why the LA Times’ Owner Courted CNN’s Top Trump Defender appeared first on Vanity Fair.
